As we read through the applications for our farmers group, a certain root keeps popping up: “-shirika-.” As in “kushirikiana” (to cooperate or share) or “ushirikiano” (cooperation.) We’ve noticed before the heavy influence from previous NGOs working in the area, and are seeing it even more so as we’ve begun to form our group, an action that other NGOs have done countless times (though hopefully we’re tweaking it a bit to get more productive and sustainable results.) These applicants know the language to use with us, they know what warms the cockles of our little NGO hearts, and they know that we like to extol the benefits of working together and sharing ideas. But there are other concepts that are harder for them to understand—the idea that they are the ones driving this project, not the NGO with money and expertise, that higher prices don’t always mean better profits, that they need to think through decisions carefully instead of just doing exactly what we say. Take, for example, getting people to understand that they are not yet a group. The Bungu Project is structured so that potential group members receive a series of trainings that will help them decide whether or not joining the group is a good decision for them. If it is, they apply and interview with us. Only then, if they are accepted, will they be a part of the group. This group formation and decision-making process flies against the paradigm of group formation by other NGOs—they give a seminar, first come first serve—and afterwards, all people that show up are part of the group. Grasping that they must apply to this group after carefully considering their options has been a struggle for many.
In some regards, working against the precedents other NGOs have set has been a struggle, but in many other regards, it is also the precedents they’ve set that have made our work so much easier. It’s why people in Bungu show up at meetings on time when working with NGOs and why they are familiar with the concept of working together. These previous groups have laid the ground work for us and standing on their shoulders (after straightening them out a bit), we will reach further. While we may not be actively working together as organizations, which really is a shame, but more on that in a bit, it is the sum of our work and our influence that are shirikiana-ing and adding up.
And on that note of NGO partnership and cooperation, there seems to be, more often than not, a bitter competitiveness between NGOs working in the same region or field. It often doesn’t seem like we want to work together, but rather, rip apart each others’ models and efforts—a waste of a lot of good intentions and potential for growth and improvement. It seems to me that even the big corporations of the money-hungry private sector with its cut-throat board rooms have realized the value of working together with their competition to expand the sector as a whole better than we NGOs, the supposedly softer world of good intentions, have. Even if companies do it from a pragmatic viewpoint only, it is a pragmatism that they have taken advantage of and has served them well, and a pragmatism and realism NGOs would do well to emulate when it comes to partnerships and working together, the very habits that we push amongst our aid recipients.
3/12/12





